Citrini Research vs Conks
Citrini Research and Conks both sit in Macro & Monetary Dynamics, and are compared here on the same fields used across the index: Research Authority Score, published price, asset class, format and vintage. Both are classified independently, and neither pays for its position on this page.
Choose Citrini Research for
- —a higher Research Authority Score (99 against 95)
- —mixed-style publishing rather than analysis
Choose Conks for
- —a cheaper entry tier (~$20/mo · $200/yr against ~$50/mo · $500/yr)
- —analysis-style publishing rather than mixed
- —a longer track record (publishing since 2020)
Data verified 2026-10-04 · independent scoring, no paid rankings
| Field | Citrini Research | Conks |
|---|---|---|
| Research Authority | 99/100 | 95/100 |
| Type | Mixed | Analysis |
| Category | Macro & Monetary Dynamics | Macro & Monetary Dynamics |
| Asset classes | Equities, Macro | Macro, Fixed Income |
| Niche | Thematic equity megatrends & cross-asset macro | Monetary dynamics & repo plumbing |
| Price | ~$50/mo · $500/yr | ~$20/mo · $200/yr |
| Access | Freemium | Freemium |
| Founded | 2023 | 2020 |
| Region | United States | United Kingdom |
| HQ | New York, US | London, UK |
Also consider
Desks that overlap with Citrini Research and Conks on category, tags or asset class, ranked by Research Authority.
The Bear Traps Report
Macro Risk & Credit Contagion
Niche · Macro risk & credit contagion
Pulsar (Spaghetti Lisbon)
Macro & Thematic Equities Desk Notes
Niche · macro & thematic equities
David Woo Unbound
Global Macro & Geopolitics
Niche · Macro-geopolitics & the dollar system
Lord Fed's Gazette
Macro Regime & Cross-Asset Trade Setups
Niche · macro regime & cross-asset trade setups
Pinebrook Capital (David Cervantes)
Policy-Driven Macro & Liquidity Frameworks
Niche · policy-driven macro & liquidity
Stenos Signals
Global Liquidity, Macro & Cross-Asset Positioning
Niche · Global liquidity & cross-asset macro
The Macro Trading Floor
Weekly Macro Trades & Liquidity
Niche · Weekly macro trades & positioning
Cubic Analytics (Caleb Franzen)
Data-Driven Macro, Equities & Bitcoin
Niche · data-driven macro, equities & bitcoin
The Fed Guy
Federal Reserve Plumbing & Money Markets
Niche · Fed operations & money markets
Frequently asked questions
Is Citrini Research better than Conks?
They lead on different things. Citrini Research scores 99/100 on Research Authority and covers Thematic equity megatrends & cross-asset macro; Conks scores 95/100 and covers Monetary dynamics & repo plumbing. Citrini Research is the stronger pick if you want a higher Research Authority Score (99 against 95), or mixed-style publishing rather than analysis. Conks is the stronger pick for a cheaper entry tier (~$20/mo · $200/yr against ~$50/mo · $500/yr), or analysis-style publishing rather than mixed.
Is Citrini Research cheaper than Conks?
Citrini Research lists ~$50/mo · $500/yr (Freemium); Conks lists ~$20/mo · $200/yr (Freemium). Price is only comparable at the tier level: an entry tier at one desk and an institutional tier at another are not the same product, so check which tier actually gives you the coverage you need.
What is the difference between Citrini Research and Conks?
Citrini Research is classified as Mixed covering Equities, Macro, publishing since 2023 from United States. Conks is classified as Analysis covering Macro, Fixed Income, publishing since 2020 from United Kingdom. The practical difference is usually format: one publishes analysis and the other publishes actionable positioning, which suit different workflows.
Can I subscribe to both Citrini Research and Conks?
Yes, and for desks in the same category it is often rational: overlapping coverage confirms or contradicts a thesis, which is useful when you are sizing a position. The cost test is whether the second subscription changes a decision. If it only repeats the first, the money is better spent on a desk in a category you do not currently read.