FED LIQUIDITYReserve balances, repo dynamics and front-end funding volatility back at the centre of the macro debate•
US EQUITIESMega-cap index concentration stays extreme as leadership narrows to a handful of AI-linked names•
PRECIOUS METALSGold holds near record highs as central-bank buying and fiscal deficits underpin hard-asset demand•
CHINA POLICYBeijing stimulus and balance-sheet repair remain the swing factor for global trade and EM risk•
FX & RATESDollar cyclicality and rate-cut pricing drive the G10 carry and cross-asset positioning debate•
CREDITPrivate-credit spreads and liability-management activity keep restructuring desks fully occupied•
FED LIQUIDITYReserve balances, repo dynamics and front-end funding volatility back at the centre of the macro debate•
US EQUITIESMega-cap index concentration stays extreme as leadership narrows to a handful of AI-linked names•
PRECIOUS METALSGold holds near record highs as central-bank buying and fiscal deficits underpin hard-asset demand•
CHINA POLICYBeijing stimulus and balance-sheet repair remain the swing factor for global trade and EM risk•
FX & RATESDollar cyclicality and rate-cut pricing drive the G10 carry and cross-asset positioning debate•
CREDITPrivate-credit spreads and liability-management activity keep restructuring desks fully occupied•
Directory/Compare/Simply Wall St vs Stockopedia
Head-to-head comparison

Simply Wall St vs Stockopedia

Simply Wall St and Stockopedia both sit in Quant, Data & Systematic and Equity & Company Research, and are compared here on the same fields used across the index: Research Authority Score, published price, asset class, format and vintage. Both are classified independently, and neither pays for its position on this page.

Choose Simply Wall St for

  • —free or freemium access, where Stockopedia is paid only

Choose Stockopedia for

  • —a longer track record (publishing since 2010)

Data verified 2026-10-04 · independent scoring, no paid rankings

FieldSimply Wall StStockopedia
Research Authority76/10076/100
TypeAnalysisAnalysis
CategoryQuant, Data & SystematicEquity & Company Research
Asset classesEquitiesEquities
NicheVisual equity research & screeningQuantitative stock screening & ranks
Price~$20/mo~$30/mo
AccessFreemiumPaid Subscription
Founded20152010
RegionAustraliaUnited Kingdom
HQSydney, AustraliaLondon, UK

Also consider

Desks that overlap with Simply Wall St and Stockopedia on category, tags or asset class, ranked by Research Authority.

USAnalysis74/100

Roic.ai

AI financial data & screening

Niche · AI financial data & screening

Equities
~$30/mo
2021
Visit
USAnalysis72/100

Stratosphere

Investment research & screening

Niche · Investment research & screening

Equities
~$50/mo
2020
Visit
USMixed80/100

Quiver Quantitative

Alternative Data & Congress Trades

Niche · Alt-data & congressional trading

Equities
~$30/mo · $300/yr
2019
Visit
INAnalysis74/100

Screener.in

Indian stock screening & financials

Niche · Indian stock screening & financials

Equities
Free
2011
Visit
INAnalysis72/100

Finbox

Valuation & screening data

Niche · Valuation & screening data

Equities
~$50/mo
2014
Visit
AUAnalysis72/100

Market Index

Australian market data & news

Niche · Australian market data & news

Equities
Free
2013
Visit
INAnalysis70/100

StockEdge

Indian market analytics

Niche · Indian market analytics

Equities
~$20/mo
2016
Visit
INAnalysis70/100

Tijori Finance

Indian fundamental & alternative data

Niche · Indian fundamental & alternative data

Equities
~$25/mo
2019
Visit
USAnalysis80/100

Zacks

Quantitative earnings estimates & ranks

Niche · Quantitative earnings estimates & ranks

Equities
~$249/yr
1978
Visit

Frequently asked questions

Is Simply Wall St better than Stockopedia?

They lead on different things. Simply Wall St scores 76/100 on Research Authority and covers Visual equity research & screening; Stockopedia scores 76/100 and covers Quantitative stock screening & ranks. Simply Wall St is the stronger pick if you want free or freemium access, where Stockopedia is paid only. Stockopedia is the stronger pick for a longer track record (publishing since 2010).

Is Simply Wall St cheaper than Stockopedia?

Simply Wall St lists ~$20/mo (Freemium); Stockopedia lists ~$30/mo (Paid Subscription). Price is only comparable at the tier level: an entry tier at one desk and an institutional tier at another are not the same product, so check which tier actually gives you the coverage you need.

What is the difference between Simply Wall St and Stockopedia?

Simply Wall St is classified as Analysis covering Equities, publishing since 2015 from Australia. Stockopedia is classified as Analysis covering Equities, publishing since 2010 from United Kingdom. The practical difference is usually format: both publish in the same format, so the split is coverage and price.

Can I subscribe to both Simply Wall St and Stockopedia?

Yes, and for desks in the same category it is often rational: overlapping coverage confirms or contradicts a thesis, which is useful when you are sizing a position. The cost test is whether the second subscription changes a decision. If it only repeats the first, the money is better spent on a desk in a category you do not currently read.