Nansen
On-chain analytics platform
Wallet-labelling and on-chain analytics platform for crypto research.
What it covers
Nansen is a analysis publication focused on On-chain analytics platform. Its coverage spans Digital Assets, and it is classified under digital assets with a asia pacific orientation, based in Singapore.
Wallet-labelling and on-chain analytics platform for crypto research.
Pricing and access
Nansen is paid-only.
The publisher does not list public pricing, so budget for a quotation request before committing.
Track record
First published in 2019, which makes it roughly 7 years into its run. Vintage matters in research: surviving one full cycle is a different claim from surviving a bull market.
It carries a Research Authority Score of 78/100, ranked 212 of 426 publications in the index, and is classified as a independent publication.
Who it is for
Nansen suits readers who want a thesis they can hold for quarters rather than a level to trade today. With a paid access model and a focus on On-chain analytics platform, it fits readers who already know the sector and want depth rather than an introduction.
If your constraint is time rather than money, the question to ask is whether the publication tells you something the free feed does not: order flow, a primary-source ledger, a model, or a mechanism nobody else has priced.
How it is scored
Every publication in this index is scored 0 to 100 on the same five pillars: primary-source rigour (35%), differentiated niche edge (25%), track record and vintage (15%), institutional adoption (15%), and transparency and independence (10%). Nansen scores 78.
Paid placement on this site affects visual prominence only. It never changes a publication's description, classification or score.
Frequently asked
- How much does Nansen cost?
- ~$150/mo.
- What does Nansen cover?
- Nansen covers On-chain analytics platform, across Digital Assets. It is published as a analysis publication from Singapore.
- How is Nansen ranked on newsletters.markets?
- It scores 78/100, ranked 212 of 426 publications in the index. Scoring weights primary-source rigour, niche depth, track record, institutional adoption and transparency. Paid placement never changes the score.