FED LIQUIDITYReserve balances, repo dynamics and front-end funding volatility back at the centre of the macro debate•
US EQUITIESMega-cap index concentration stays extreme as leadership narrows to a handful of AI-linked names•
PRECIOUS METALSGold holds near record highs as central-bank buying and fiscal deficits underpin hard-asset demand•
CHINA POLICYBeijing stimulus and balance-sheet repair remain the swing factor for global trade and EM risk•
FX & RATESDollar cyclicality and rate-cut pricing drive the G10 carry and cross-asset positioning debate•
CREDITPrivate-credit spreads and liability-management activity keep restructuring desks fully occupied•
FED LIQUIDITYReserve balances, repo dynamics and front-end funding volatility back at the centre of the macro debate•
US EQUITIESMega-cap index concentration stays extreme as leadership narrows to a handful of AI-linked names•
PRECIOUS METALSGold holds near record highs as central-bank buying and fiscal deficits underpin hard-asset demand•
CHINA POLICYBeijing stimulus and balance-sheet repair remain the swing factor for global trade and EM risk•
FX & RATESDollar cyclicality and rate-cut pricing drive the G10 carry and cross-asset positioning debate•
CREDITPrivate-credit spreads and liability-management activity keep restructuring desks fully occupied•
Directory/Compare/am/FX (Spectra Markets) vs Marc to Market
Head-to-head comparison

am/FX (Spectra Markets) vs Marc to Market

am/FX (Spectra Markets) and Marc to Market both sit in FX & Rates, and are compared here on the same fields used across the index: Research Authority Score, published price, asset class, format and vintage. Both are classified independently, and neither pays for its position on this page.

Choose am/FX (Spectra Markets) for

  • —a higher Research Authority Score (91 against 80)
  • —trading-style publishing rather than analysis

Choose Marc to Market for

  • —free or freemium access, where am/FX (Spectra Markets) is paid only
  • —analysis-style publishing rather than trading
  • —a longer track record (publishing since 2006)

Data verified 2026-10-04 · independent scoring, no paid rankings

Fieldam/FX (Spectra Markets)Marc to Market
Research Authority91/10080/100
TypeTradingAnalysis
CategoryFX & RatesFX & Rates
Asset classesFX, MacroFX, Macro
NicheDaily FX & macro trade ideasDaily currency & macro analysis
Price$69/mo · $690/yrFree
AccessPaid SubscriptionFree Open Access
Founded20162006
RegionUnited StatesUnited States
HQUnited StatesNew York, US

Also consider

Desks that overlap with am/FX (Spectra Markets) and Marc to Market on category, tags or asset class, ranked by Research Authority.

GBMixed90/100

Lord Fed's Gazette

Macro Regime & Cross-Asset Trade Setups

Niche · macro regime & cross-asset trade setups

Multi-AssetMacroFX
$90/mo · $900/yr
—
Visit
USAnalysis82/100

The Credit Strategist

Credit Markets & Macro Strategy

Niche · Credit strategy & risk

Fixed IncomeMacro
~$500/yr
2005
Visit
USMixed86/100

Capital Flows Research

Global Capital Flows, Rates & FX Plumbing

Niche · global capital flows, rates & FX

MacroFXFixed Income
Paid — price not listed
2023
Visit
USAnalysis84/100

The Daily Shot

Daily Macro Chart Pack

Niche · Daily macro charts

MacroMulti-Asset
~$300/yr
2016
Visit
USAnalysis80/100

Pragmatic Capitalism

Macro & Portfolio Construction

Niche · Macro & portfolio strategy

Macro
Free
2010
Visit
DKMixed90/100

Steno Research

Macro Regime & Asset Allocation

Niche · Macro regime, rates & FX allocation

MacroFXFixed Income
~$29/mo
2022
Visit
USMixed89/100

Eliant Capital

Macro, Event-Driven & Cross-Asset Trading

Niche · Event-driven & cross-asset special situations

EquitiesCommoditiesFixed IncomeFX
~$760/yr
2023
Visit
CAAnalysis81/100

The Macro Tourist

Macro Complacency & Market Cycles

Niche · Macro complacency & cycles

Macro
Free
2015
Visit
USAnalysis84/100

Bannockburn Global Forex

FX Strategy & Hedging Advisory

Niche · FX strategy & hedging advisory

FX
Free
2009
Visit

Frequently asked questions

Is am/FX (Spectra Markets) better than Marc to Market?

They lead on different things. am/FX (Spectra Markets) scores 91/100 on Research Authority and covers Daily FX & macro trade ideas; Marc to Market scores 80/100 and covers Daily currency & macro analysis. am/FX (Spectra Markets) is the stronger pick if you want a higher Research Authority Score (91 against 80), or trading-style publishing rather than analysis. Marc to Market is the stronger pick for free or freemium access, where am/FX (Spectra Markets) is paid only, or analysis-style publishing rather than trading.

Is am/FX (Spectra Markets) cheaper than Marc to Market?

am/FX (Spectra Markets) lists $69/mo · $690/yr (Paid Subscription); Marc to Market lists Free (Free Open Access). Price is only comparable at the tier level: an entry tier at one desk and an institutional tier at another are not the same product, so check which tier actually gives you the coverage you need.

What is the difference between am/FX (Spectra Markets) and Marc to Market?

am/FX (Spectra Markets) is classified as Trading covering FX, Macro, publishing since 2016 from United States. Marc to Market is classified as Analysis covering FX, Macro, publishing since 2006 from United States. The practical difference is usually format: one publishes analysis and the other publishes actionable positioning, which suit different workflows.

Can I subscribe to both am/FX (Spectra Markets) and Marc to Market?

Yes, and for desks in the same category it is often rational: overlapping coverage confirms or contradicts a thesis, which is useful when you are sizing a position. The cost test is whether the second subscription changes a decision. If it only repeats the first, the money is better spent on a desk in a category you do not currently read.

Related comparisons