Bannockburn Global Forex vs Marc to Market
Bannockburn Global Forex and Marc to Market both sit in FX & Rates, and are compared here on the same fields used across the index: Research Authority Score, published price, asset class, format and vintage. Both are classified independently, and neither pays for its position on this page.
Choose Bannockburn Global Forex for
- —a higher Research Authority Score (84 against 80)
Choose Marc to Market for
- —broader asset-class coverage (FX, Macro)
- —a longer track record (publishing since 2006)
Data verified 2026-10-04 · independent scoring, no paid rankings
| Field | Bannockburn Global Forex | Marc to Market |
|---|---|---|
| Research Authority | 84/100 | 80/100 |
| Type | Analysis | Analysis |
| Category | FX & Rates | FX & Rates |
| Asset classes | FX | FX, Macro |
| Niche | FX strategy & hedging advisory | Daily currency & macro analysis |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Access | Free Open Access | Free Open Access |
| Founded | 2009 | 2006 |
| Region | United States | United States |
| HQ | New York, US | New York, US |
Also consider
Desks that overlap with Bannockburn Global Forex and Marc to Market on category, tags or asset class, ranked by Research Authority.
am/FX (Spectra Markets)
Daily FX & Global Macro Trades
Niche · Daily FX & macro trade ideas
Steno Research
Macro Regime & Asset Allocation
Niche · Macro regime, rates & FX allocation
Capital Flows Research
Global Capital Flows, Rates & FX Plumbing
Niche · global capital flows, rates & FX
Hedgeye Risk Management
Institutional Macro Risk Management
Niche · institutional macro risk management
Fundstrat Global Advisors
Independent Macro & Equity Strategy
Niche · independent macro & equity strategy
The Credit Strategist
Credit Markets & Macro Strategy
Niche · Credit strategy & risk
The Macro Tourist
Macro Complacency & Market Cycles
Niche · Macro complacency & cycles
Frequently asked questions
Is Bannockburn Global Forex better than Marc to Market?
They lead on different things. Bannockburn Global Forex scores 84/100 on Research Authority and covers FX strategy & hedging advisory; Marc to Market scores 80/100 and covers Daily currency & macro analysis. Bannockburn Global Forex is the stronger pick if you want a higher Research Authority Score (84 against 80). Marc to Market is the stronger pick for broader asset-class coverage (FX, Macro), or a longer track record (publishing since 2006).
Is Bannockburn Global Forex cheaper than Marc to Market?
Bannockburn Global Forex lists Free (Free Open Access); Marc to Market lists Free (Free Open Access). Price is only comparable at the tier level: an entry tier at one desk and an institutional tier at another are not the same product, so check which tier actually gives you the coverage you need.
What is the difference between Bannockburn Global Forex and Marc to Market?
Bannockburn Global Forex is classified as Analysis covering FX, publishing since 2009 from United States. Marc to Market is classified as Analysis covering FX, Macro, publishing since 2006 from United States. The practical difference is usually format: both publish in the same format, so the split is coverage and price.
Can I subscribe to both Bannockburn Global Forex and Marc to Market?
Yes, and for desks in the same category it is often rational: overlapping coverage confirms or contradicts a thesis, which is useful when you are sizing a position. The cost test is whether the second subscription changes a decision. If it only repeats the first, the money is better spent on a desk in a category you do not currently read.