Bannockburn Global Forex vs FXStreet
Bannockburn Global Forex and FXStreet both sit in FX & Rates, and are compared here on the same fields used across the index: Research Authority Score, published price, asset class, format and vintage. Both are classified independently, and neither pays for its position on this page.
Choose Bannockburn Global Forex for
- —a higher Research Authority Score (84 against 74)
- —analysis-style publishing rather than trading
Choose FXStreet for
- —trading-style publishing rather than analysis
- —a longer track record (publishing since 2000)
Data verified 2026-10-04 · independent scoring, no paid rankings
| Field | Bannockburn Global Forex | FXStreet |
|---|---|---|
| Research Authority | 84/100 | 74/100 |
| Type | Analysis | Trading |
| Category | FX & Rates | FX & Rates |
| Asset classes | FX | FX |
| Niche | FX strategy & hedging advisory | FX news & technicals |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Access | Free Open Access | Free Open Access |
| Founded | 2009 | 2000 |
| Region | United States | Spain |
| HQ | New York, US | Barcelona, Spain |
Also consider
Desks that overlap with Bannockburn Global Forex and FXStreet on category, tags or asset class, ranked by Research Authority.
Marc to Market
Currency & Macro Commentary
Niche · Daily currency & macro analysis
am/FX (Spectra Markets)
Daily FX & Global Macro Trades
Niche · Daily FX & macro trade ideas
Steno Research
Macro Regime & Asset Allocation
Niche · Macro regime, rates & FX allocation
Capital Flows Research
Global Capital Flows, Rates & FX Plumbing
Niche · global capital flows, rates & FX
Hedgeye Risk Management
Institutional Macro Risk Management
Niche · institutional macro risk management
Fundstrat Global Advisors
Independent Macro & Equity Strategy
Niche · independent macro & equity strategy
The Market Ear
Market Flows, Positioning & Volatility
Niche · Flows, positioning & volatility
Lord Fed's Gazette
Macro Regime & Cross-Asset Trade Setups
Niche · macro regime & cross-asset trade setups
Frequently asked questions
Is Bannockburn Global Forex better than FXStreet?
They lead on different things. Bannockburn Global Forex scores 84/100 on Research Authority and covers FX strategy & hedging advisory; FXStreet scores 74/100 and covers FX news & technicals. Bannockburn Global Forex is the stronger pick if you want a higher Research Authority Score (84 against 74), or analysis-style publishing rather than trading. FXStreet is the stronger pick for trading-style publishing rather than analysis, or a longer track record (publishing since 2000).
Is Bannockburn Global Forex cheaper than FXStreet?
Bannockburn Global Forex lists Free (Free Open Access); FXStreet lists Free (Free Open Access). Price is only comparable at the tier level: an entry tier at one desk and an institutional tier at another are not the same product, so check which tier actually gives you the coverage you need.
What is the difference between Bannockburn Global Forex and FXStreet?
Bannockburn Global Forex is classified as Analysis covering FX, publishing since 2009 from United States. FXStreet is classified as Trading covering FX, publishing since 2000 from Spain. The practical difference is usually format: one publishes analysis and the other publishes actionable positioning, which suit different workflows.
Can I subscribe to both Bannockburn Global Forex and FXStreet?
Yes, and for desks in the same category it is often rational: overlapping coverage confirms or contradicts a thesis, which is useful when you are sizing a position. The cost test is whether the second subscription changes a decision. If it only repeats the first, the money is better spent on a desk in a category you do not currently read.